The 70-20-10 rule aligns with Clayton Christensen's ideas on innovation in the sense that it encourages a balanced approach to investment in innovation. Christensen's theory of disruptive innovation suggests that companies should not only focus on improving existing technologies (core) but also invest in developing new ones (transformational). The 70-20-10 rule suggests a similar approach, with 70% of resources dedicated to core technologies, 20% to adjacent, and 10% to transformational innovation.

Asked on the following presentation:

resource preview

Innovative Solutions

Why do so many perfectly managed companies fail? Inspired by the seminal work of author Clayton Christensen, this deck provides the solutions to the “...

download
Download this presentation in

Get 5 out of 24 slides

Powerpoint Keynote Google Slides
Not for commercial use
Microsoft Powerpoint
Not for commercial use
Microsoft Powerpoint
Not for commercial use

Or, start for free ⬇️

Download and customize this and hundreds of business presentation templates for free

Voila! You can now download this presentation

Download

presentation Preview

View all chevron_right

Question was asked on:

How do you know how much to invest in each category? Use the 70-20-10 rule. A safe allocation dedicates 70% of resources to core technologies, 20% to adjacent, and 10% to transformational innovation to test the waters. Think about Meta and their $10 billion allocation to VR and the metaverse through metaverse labs. With $71 billion in expenses in 2021, that accounts for about a 14% allocation. (Slide 12)

Questions and answers

info icon

The 70-20-10 rule can be adapted for smaller businesses or startups by scaling the percentages according to the company's resources. For instance, 70% of the resources could be dedicated to core operations or technologies that are crucial for the business's survival and growth. 20% could be allocated to adjacent areas or technologies that are related to the core operations but offer potential for expansion or diversification. The remaining 10% could be invested in transformational or innovative projects that have the potential to significantly impact the business's future, but also carry a higher risk. It's important to note that these percentages are not fixed and can be adjusted based on the business's specific circumstances and risk tolerance.

Under-investing in core technologies can lead to several consequences. Firstly, it can result in a lack of competitiveness as competitors may invest more and thus have more advanced technologies. Secondly, it can lead to inefficiencies in operations as outdated technologies may not be as efficient as newer ones. Thirdly, it can lead to a lack of innovation as there may not be enough resources to explore new technologies and ideas. Lastly, it can lead to customer dissatisfaction as they may expect the latest technologies from the company.

View all questions
stars icon Ask another question