Can you compare the MVP approach with other product development strategies?

The MVP (Minimum Viable Product) approach is a product development strategy where a new product is developed with sufficient features to satisfy early adopters. The final, complete set of features is only designed and developed after considering feedback from the product's initial users. This approach helps in avoiding the development of products that customers do not want. It is less resource-intensive as it does not require the full set of features to be developed initially. It allows for fast and quantitative market testing of a product or product feature.

On the other hand, traditional product development strategies often involve a long development cycle where all the features are built in one go before the product is launched in the market. This approach can be resource-intensive and risky if the product fails to meet the market expectations.

In comparison, the MVP approach is more flexible and cost-effective. It allows for iterative testing and development based on real user feedback, reducing the risk of product failure.

Question was asked on:

When the founders of Uber started the project, they wanted to build a way for anyone to buy a black car service straight from their phone called Ubercab. They created a simple prototype with three features: First, the ability to request a car to your location via a text with your address; second, a licensed professional driver in a black car that shows up at the curb, and three, an automatic charge to the credit card on file.

Asked on the following presentation:

Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

How can you create the best product with the least cost of failure? Use our Minimum Viable Product presentation to dedicate the right resources and de...

file_save

Download free weekly presentations