The traditional waterfall method in project management has several drawbacks. Firstly, it is a linear approach where one phase must be completed before moving on to the next, which can lead to delays if changes are needed. Secondly, it does not allow for much flexibility or adaptability, as once a stage is completed, it is difficult to go back and make changes. Lastly, it assumes that all requirements can be defined upfront and remain unchanged throughout the project, which is often not the case in real-world scenarios.
This question was asked on the following presentation:
Has the traditional linear approach to project management left you over budget with an under-developed product and dragged out time-to-market? An agil...
Go to dashboard to download stunning resources
DownloadText this question was asked on:
We begin with an overview of the agile methodology and how it is used in project management. was originally developed as a newer approach to software development, but its ethos has been translated and applied to project management, product development, and even organizational management. For any team to be responsive and quick to adapt, agile can be a much stronger method to follow as opposed to the traditional, waterfall method where tasks are accomplished in a linear sequence.