The 37% rule, also known as the secretary problem, suggests that you should spend the first 37% of your time gathering information and the rest of the time acting on it. In the context of hiring, this means interviewing the first 37% of candidates to understand the talent pool and then picking the next best candidate.

However, if you find a seemingly perfect candidate within the first 37%, it's still recommended to continue interviewing. This is because there might be someone even better in the remaining pool. The rule is about maximizing your chances of finding the best candidate, not necessarily the first good one you come across.

Remember, this is a mathematical model and real-life hiring involves many other factors.

stars icon
27 questions and answers
info icon

The 37% rule, when applied to hiring, suggests that a company should spend the first 37% of the interview process to understand the talent pool and then hire the next best candidate. This could potentially improve the company's overall performance by increasing the chances of hiring the best candidate. However, it's important to note that this rule is based on probability and doesn't guarantee the best outcome every time.

The 37% rule can be used to improve the efficiency of the hiring process by applying it to the interview process. If an employer is interviewing 100 applicants, they should spend the first 37% of interviews familiarizing themselves with the talent pool and identifying the best qualities. After this point, they should hire the next applicant who appears to be the best so far. This approach gives the company a 37% chance of hiring the best candidate. The odds of success increase with fewer applicants.

The 37% rule can potentially improve the hiring process by increasing the chances of selecting the best candidate. By spending the first 37% of the time getting familiar with the talent pool, an employer can identify the best qualities to look for in candidates. After this period, the employer is advised to hire the next candidate who appears to be the best so far, which gives a 37% chance of that person being the best candidate. The odds become even greater with fewer applicants.

View all 27 questions
stars icon Ask another question
This question was asked on the following resource:

Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths

Can computer science teach us the secrets of life? Perhaps not, but they can shed light on how certa...

View summary
resource preview

Download and customize more than 500 business templates

Start here ⬇️

Go to dashboard to view and download stunning resources

Download