Question

In what scenarios would an organization choose to use BPR over TQM?

An organization would choose to use Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) over Total Quality Management (TQM) when it seeks radical, high-impact changes. BPR is a systematic approach to make dramatic improvements by rethinking and redesigning business processes from the ground up. It's often chosen when the current processes are deemed inefficient or when the organization is facing significant challenges that incremental improvements (offered by TQM) cannot solve. However, it's important to note that BPR involves higher risks and costs compared to TQM due to its radical nature.

This question was asked on:

When would an organization elect to use BPR over TQM, otherwise known as continuous improvement? The big difference between BPR and continuous improvement is that BPR is more radical and can lead to a complete redesign and overhaul of an organization's internal structures. Where continuous improvement attempts to make subtle enhancements to create gradual change, BPR makes radical change for high-impact, dramatic improvements. (Slide 4)

Asked on

Preview (15 slides)

Title Slide preview
Functional Vs. Process-Oriented Slide preview
Bpr Vs. Continuous Improvement Slide preview
Benefits & Objectives Of Bpr Slide preview
BPR IN 5 PHASES Slide preview
BPR Phases Slide preview
Common Tools For  Business Process Re-Engineering Slide preview
Stages Of BPR Slide preview
Business Process Reengineeringongoing Continuous Improvement Slide preview
BPR Service Levels Slide preview
Common BPR Tools Slide preview
Change Management Curve Slide preview
Gap Analysis Slide preview
Bench Marking Slide preview
Value Chain Analysis Slide preview

Join for free.
Get new presentations each week.

Receive new free presentations every Monday to your inbox.
Full content, complete versions — No credit card required.

OR

Trusted by top partners