Some of the innovative ideas presented in 'The Surprising Science of Meetings' include the importance of leaders being aware of informal cues during meetings, such as attendees multitasking on phones or having side conversations. This can indicate that the meeting dynamics are not ideal. The book also suggests conducting a periodic assessment of meeting quality every three months using an anonymous short survey. These strategies can help transform tiresome and costly meetings into productive sessions.

Asked on the following book summary:

resource preview

The Surprising Science of Meetings

How can you lead engaging meetings that unlock creativity, effectiveness, and dynamism? Turn tiresome and costly meetings into productive sessions wit...

Download, customize, and translate hundreds of business templates for free

Start for free ⬇️

Go to dashboard to download stunning templates

Download

book summary Preview

View all chevron_right

Question was asked on:

Send feedback Leaders must keep an eye out for informal cues like attendees multitasking on phones and side conversations to sense that the meeting dynamics are not ideal. It's best to do a periodic assessment of meeting quality every three months using an anonymous short survey. One simple set of questions could be:

stars icon
Questions and answers
info icon

The lessons from "The Surprising Science of Meetings" can be applied in today's business environment to make meetings more productive by implementing several strategies. First, leaders should be observant of informal cues such as attendees multitasking on phones or engaging in side conversations, as these may indicate that the meeting dynamics are not ideal. Regular assessments of meeting quality, perhaps every three months, can also be beneficial. This could be done using an anonymous short survey. The goal is to create an environment that fosters creativity, effectiveness, and dynamism, turning tiresome and costly meetings into productive sessions.

The concept of "periodic assessment of meeting quality" as explained in the book "The Surprising Science of Meetings" refers to the regular evaluation of the effectiveness and productivity of meetings. This is typically done every three months using an anonymous short survey. The purpose of this assessment is to identify any issues or areas of improvement in the meeting dynamics. Leaders should be observant of informal cues such as attendees multitasking on phones or engaging in side conversations, as these may indicate that the meeting dynamics are not ideal. By conducting these assessments periodically, leaders can ensure that their meetings are productive and effective.

View all questions
stars icon Ask another question