Brave New Work

Synopsis

What is stopping you from doing your best work? Are you constantly frustrated by silo-ed functions, meeting overload, and slow decision-making? It's not your strategy or your business model that's the problem—it's your Operating System.

Your legacy organization can become a smarter, healthier, and more dynamic evolutionary organization when you improve or even overhaul your current Operating System. Read this summary of Brave New Work to find out how to focus on self-sufficient teams that experiment, innovate, and ultimately allow your organization to run itself.

Questions and answers

What are some resources to learn more about evolutionary organizations?

View answer

There are numerous resources available to learn more about evolutionary organizations. Some of the most popular ones include books like 'Reinventing Organizations' by Frederic Laloux, 'Teal Organization' by Jos de Blok, and 'Holacracy' by Brian J. Robertson. Online platforms like Coursera and Udemy also offer courses on the subject. Additionally, various websites and blogs provide articles and case studies on evolutionary organizations.

How does the transformation into an evolutionary organization affect the employees?

View answer

The transformation into an evolutionary organization can have a profound impact on employees. It encourages them to become more self-sufficient and innovative, fostering a culture of experimentation and autonomy. This can lead to increased job satisfaction, as employees feel more engaged and valued. However, it may also present challenges, as employees need to adapt to new ways of working and thinking.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Top 20 insights

1. Workers in the U.S. spend 16% of their working lives on internal compliance activities such as planning and budgeting. The Taylor Principles developed 100 years ago have morphed into a stifling bureaucracy, leaving us with the burden of organizational debt, that is, structures and policies that no longer serve the organization.
2. The most widely used systems don't necessarily have the best quality. For example, in the U.S. there is only one roundabout for every 1,118 signal intersections. But roundabouts are actually safer, move traffic more quickly, cheaper to build and maintain, and still function when the power goes out.
3. Many firms are trying to be agile by "

   doing

   "agile, adopting the methods but not the theory behind them. Certifying project managers in Scrum does not upend bureaucracy. Agile is a mindset, not a toolset.
4. The organization's activities may be complicated—like a car engine, something that can be controlled, and its problems solved. However, the organization itself is complex—like traffic, we can only make informed guesses about its behavior based on the relationships between its components, not the components themselves.
5. Mergers and acquisitions are creating "too big to fail" mega-firms even as research from McKinsey has shown that almost 70% of mergers fail to produce the promised revenue synergies. In response, firms are cutting R&D costs, outsourcing, and laying off workers.
6. The 100-year-old Swedish bank Svenska Handelsbanken deploys its various resources around the notion that "The branch is the bank." Each of the 800+ branches is free to make their own decisions about resource allocations, including lending decisions, marketing, and services.
7. Psychologists Maslow and Rogers showed that people are naturally motivated and capable of self-direction. Similarly, Deci and Ryan's Self Determination Theory found that people have an innate psychological need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
8. Email is a context-free information sinkhole. The average employee checks their email 36 times an hour and receives 304 emails a week. Ban internal email in favor of a messaging app like Slack.
9. Spotify ensures that teams are "loosely coupled but tightly aligned." The company's approach to workflow looks like a regatta of speedboats heading in the same general direction rather than one massive ocean liner trying to wend its way through a series of functions.
10. Ensure the organization gets more interesting over time. A recent McKinsey study found that companies in the top quartile for gender and ethnic diversity are, respectively, 15% and 35% more likely to outperform those in the bottom quartile.
11. The average employee attends 62 meetings a month and thinks that more than half of them are a waste of time. For U.S. businesses, that adds up to $37 billion in salary costs spent on unnecessary meetings. Cancel all meetings for two weeks, so you can find out which ones you really need.
12. Ditch time-wasting status update meetings in favor of a monthly governance meeting where everyone voices concerns and proposes changes. Hold periodic retrospective meetings for people to share perspectives on what happened and what they learned.
13. The average manager spends up to 210 hours preparing for and doing annual appraisals, a process that makes employees spectators in their development. Instead, let them solicit and guide their own feedback, with periodic updates and input from team members.
14. Get away from the traditional budgeting process, which is unresponsive to changing conditions. Ditch fixed targets in favor of relative ones, company to company, and team to team.
15. Higher pay decreases job dissatisfaction but doesn't meaningfully increase satisfaction. Compensation should be fair and generous enough to not matter. Use profit sharing to connect everyone to the organization's success. Eliminate bonuses and instead pay above market for the best talent you can find.
16. Innovation often happens unintentionally. Play-Doh was supposed to be a cleaning product for wallpaper until kids started misusing it. Let innovation happen across the organization. People are inherently creative, so trust them to sense and pursue opportunities.
17. Culture cannot be designed; it has to emerge. You cannot change hearts and minds with a haiku. Instead, we have to focus on changing the system, and we have to recognize that change is not a finite journey.
18. Six patterns set the conditions for change: the commitment of leaders; setting boundaries; priming a catalyst team; practicing looping; recognizing criticality; and allowing and protecting continuity.
19. Looping is the continual three-stage process where change is decentralized, and self-management begins: identify tensions; propose practices; and conduct experiments.
20. The most significant barrier to change is the leader. Leadership has to recognize the importance of creating the space for change and then stepping out of the way.

Summary

Legacy organizations carry a burden of organizational debt that does not serve the needs of a complex organization trying to navigate through a rapidly changing world. Shifting to an evolutionary organization requires us to question and reinvent our approach across the twelve domains that make up the organization's operating system.

Questions and answers

What are some ways to measure the success of the shift to an evolutionary organization?

View answer

The success of the shift to an evolutionary organization can be measured in several ways. One way is to assess the organization's ability to adapt to changes in the environment. This can be done by looking at how quickly and effectively the organization is able to implement new strategies and processes in response to changes in the market or industry. Another way is to evaluate the level of employee engagement and satisfaction. If employees are more engaged and satisfied, it is a good indication that the shift is successful. Additionally, the organization's financial performance can also be a measure of success. If the organization is able to maintain or improve its financial performance after the shift, it is a sign that the shift is successful.

How does the shift to an evolutionary organization impact employees?

View answer

The shift to an evolutionary organization can have a significant impact on employees. It requires them to adapt to new ways of working and thinking, which can be challenging but also rewarding. They may need to learn new skills, embrace new technologies, and become more flexible and adaptable. It can also lead to a more empowering and engaging work environment, as employees are often given more autonomy and are encouraged to innovate and take risks. However, it can also create uncertainty and discomfort, as change is often difficult and the transition can be disruptive.

View all questions

Ask follow up

The organization needs a strong sense of collective purpose, decentralized authority, and a dynamic network of small, self-sufficient teams whose members are free to organize around projects and programs. Each team should be able to learn and change course, have control over its resources, and innovate using local methods and tools. Minimize meetings and make sure all information is readily available to all participants. Allow teams to reinvent themselves continually and to learn from each other. Start with a small group and give them the space to practice looping: identify tensions, propose practices, and conduct experiments. Start with smaller, shorter experiments and gradually expand to the wider organization. Eventually, the change reaches a tipping point where you can focus on sustaining a more autonomous and evolutionary organization.

Questions and answers

What are some examples of autonomous and evolutionary organizations?

View answer

Examples of autonomous and evolutionary organizations are those that have a strong sense of collective purpose, decentralized authority, and a dynamic network of small, self-sufficient teams. These teams have the freedom to organize around projects and programs, control their resources, and innovate using local methods and tools. They are allowed to continually reinvent themselves and learn from each other. The organization starts with a small group and gives them the space to practice looping: identifying tensions, proposing practices, and conducting experiments. They start with smaller, shorter experiments and gradually expand to the wider organization. Eventually, the change reaches a tipping point where the focus is on sustaining a more autonomous and evolutionary organization.

How can an organization effectively give a small group the space to practice looping?

View answer

An organization can effectively give a small group the space to practice looping by starting with a small group and allowing them to identify tensions, propose practices, and conduct experiments. It's important to start with smaller, shorter experiments and gradually expand to the wider organization. This process should be supported by a strong sense of collective purpose, decentralized authority, and a dynamic network of small, self-sufficient teams. These teams should have control over their resources and be free to innovate using local methods and tools. Information should be readily available to all participants and meetings should be minimized.

View all questions

Ask follow up

The legacy organization

Everywhere, leaders and teams are frustrated. The scale and bureaucracy of our organizations are liabilities in the contemporary era of constant change. People insist on doing everything through channels, refer everything to committees, or haggle over the precise wording of communications and minutes. Faced with rapid changes, they ask for caution, hold conferences, and add more procedures and clearances. All this happens because within our organizations, there is a hidden set of inherited assumptions, essentially an operating system running unnoticed in the background.

Questions and answers

How does the inherited assumptions within an organization's operating system affect its ability to adapt to rapid changes?

View answer

Inherited assumptions within an organization's operating system can significantly affect its ability to adapt to rapid changes. These assumptions, often unnoticed, form the basis of the organization's operating system and influence how it responds to changes. If these assumptions are rigid or outdated, they can lead to slow decision-making, excessive bureaucracy, and resistance to change. This can hinder the organization's ability to adapt quickly to new situations or changes in the business environment. Therefore, it's crucial for organizations to regularly review and challenge these inherited assumptions to ensure they are conducive to agility and adaptability.

What are the potential challenges leaders might face when trying to change the operating system of their organizations?

View answer

Leaders might face several challenges when trying to change the operating system of their organizations. Firstly, there might be resistance to change from employees who are comfortable with the current system. Secondly, the process of change can be time-consuming and costly. Thirdly, there might be technical issues during the transition period. Lastly, the new system might not be as effective as expected, leading to decreased productivity or other unforeseen problems.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Traffic signals vs. roundabouts

Consider two ways to control traffic where two roads cross: a signal-controlled intersection and a roundabout. In the U.S. there is only one roundabout for every 1,118 signal intersections. While signal-controlled intersections are overwhelmingly popular, roundabouts are actually safer, move traffic more quickly, cheaper to build and maintain, and still function when the power goes out. This goes to show that just because one system is more widely used does not mean it is of better quality.

Questions and answers

What potential obstacles might companies face when trying to implement the concepts from Brave New Work and how could they overcome them?

View answer

Companies might face several obstacles when trying to implement the concepts from Brave New Work. These could include resistance to change, lack of understanding of the new concepts, and difficulty in breaking down existing silos. To overcome these, companies could invest in training and education to ensure everyone understands the new concepts. They could also start small, implementing changes in one department before rolling them out company-wide. Finally, they could seek external help, such as hiring a consultant or coach with experience in implementing these types of changes.

Can you elaborate on the comparison between signal-controlled intersections and roundabouts as mentioned in Brave New Work?

View answer

Signal-controlled intersections and roundabouts are two ways to control traffic where two roads cross. Signal-controlled intersections are more common in the U.S., with a ratio of 1,118 signal intersections to every roundabout. However, roundabouts are considered safer, more efficient in moving traffic, cheaper to build and maintain, and they continue to function even when the power goes out. This comparison illustrates that a more widely used system is not necessarily of better quality.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Legacy organizations are like the signal-controlled intersections, the default setting that everyone uses because everyone else has been using it. Roundabouts are akin to evolutionary organizations, a better way of doing things that requires adopting a shift in mindset and a new operating system.

How we got here

The operating system of legacy organization started on the factory floors of the Industrial Revolution over 100 years ago, when F. W. Taylor broke the work down into its smallest possible components and found the one best way to complete each step. His 1911 book Principles of Scientific Management separated thinking from doing and became the foundational text for the factory operating system. Around the same time, Henry Gantt produced the Gannt chart that illustrates dependencies within complicated processes and projects. Over time, meeting the steps of the plan became the goal, instead of being a means to an end.

Questions and answers

What are some innovative strategies to reduce the time spent on internal compliance activities like planning and budgeting in an organization?

View answer

To reduce the time spent on internal compliance activities like planning and budgeting, organizations can adopt several innovative strategies. Firstly, they can automate repetitive tasks using technology. This can significantly reduce the time spent on these activities. Secondly, organizations can simplify their processes. This involves eliminating unnecessary steps and streamlining the remaining ones. Thirdly, organizations can encourage cross-functional collaboration. This can help to reduce the time spent on coordination and improve efficiency. Lastly, organizations can provide training to their employees to improve their skills and knowledge in these areas. This can help to reduce errors and rework, thereby saving time.

Can you provide examples of companies that have successfully transitioned from a legacy organization to an evolutionary and autonomous one?

View answer

Some examples of companies that have successfully transitioned from a legacy organization to an evolutionary and autonomous one include Spotify, Netflix, and Valve Corporation. Spotify has adopted a model of autonomous teams called 'squads', each with the freedom to decide what to build, how to build it, and how to work together while building it. Netflix has a culture of 'freedom and responsibility', where employees have great freedom to make decisions, but are expected to act in the best interests of the company. Valve Corporation, a video game developer, operates without managers, and employees are free to choose what to work on, leading to a highly innovative environment.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Today, the legacy organization separates thinking from doing, demands detailed plans before every initiative, focuses on a chain of command, and works around an ironclad budget. U.S. workers spend 16% of their working lives on internal compliance activities like planning and budgeting. The Taylor Principles have morphed into a stifling bureaucracy, leaving us with a burden of organizational debt—structures and policies that no longer serve the organization.

Ask follow up

Legacy limitations

Corporate longevity has plummeted—the half-life of all firms is now just 10.5 years—and the average stock holding time has fallen from 8 years to 5 days. Corporations are getting bigger but their return on assets, the ratio of their profits to what they own and owe, is trending steadily downward. Mergers and acquisitions are creating "too big to fail" megafirms even as research from McKinsey has shown that almost 70% of mergers fail to produce the promised revenue synergies. In response, firms are cutting R&D costs, outsourcing, and laying off workers. Labor productivity growth has turned negative in recent years, while the pay ratio between CEOs and workers has jumped from 22: 3.1 in 1973 to 271:1 in 2016. Meanwhile, innovation is coming from elsewhere; small businesses, for example, now produce 16 times more patents than big ones.

Questions and answers

What are the potential real-world implications of viewing workers as naturally motivated and capable of self-direction?

View answer

Viewing workers as naturally motivated and capable of self-direction can have several real-world implications. It can lead to a more engaged and productive workforce as employees feel valued and trusted. This approach can also foster innovation as employees are encouraged to think independently and contribute their unique ideas. It can also reduce the need for strict supervision and micromanagement, freeing up resources for other strategic initiatives. Lastly, it can contribute to a positive work culture, enhancing employee satisfaction and retention.

How can the principles of autonomy, competence, and relatedness be applied in a legacy organization?

View answer

In a legacy organization, the principles of autonomy, competence, and relatedness can be applied by shifting the management approach from a mechanistic to a more humanistic view. Autonomy can be promoted by allowing employees to have more control over their work and decision-making processes. Competence can be fostered by providing opportunities for skill development and acknowledging employees' expertise. Relatedness can be enhanced by fostering a sense of community and belonging among employees. This shift can lead to increased motivation and productivity.

View all questions

Ask follow up

The legacy organization views its workers mechanistically, seeing them as motivated by rewards and punishments and in need of precise instructions. However, the work of psychologists Maslow and Rogers has shown that people are naturally motivated and capable of self-direction. Similarly, Deci and Ryan's work found that people have an innate psychological need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

Ask follow up

Complexity vs. complicated

We assume that complexity and complicated are the same things, when in fact they are not. A complicated system is something like a car engine: it is subject to cause and effect, any problems have solutions and can be fixed, and it can be controlled. A complex system, on the other hand, is more like traffic: it is dispositional, meaning we can only make informed guesses about how it will behave, it is made up of a large number of components whose interactions can surprise you, and it is based around the relationships between its components, not the components themselves.

Questions and answers

What are the key differences between a legacy organization and an evolutionary organization in terms of performance and compliance?

View answer

Legacy organizations view performance as a function of compliance, meaning they believe that if everyone follows the rules and does what they're told, the organization will achieve its goals. On the other hand, evolutionary organizations see performance as a result of collective intelligence and self-regulation. They believe that if the right conditions are created, everyone will continually find ways to achieve the goals.

Are there examples of legacy organizations that have successfully transitioned into evolutionary organizations?

View answer

Yes, there are several examples of legacy organizations that have successfully transitioned into evolutionary organizations. One such example is Microsoft. Under the leadership of Satya Nadella, Microsoft transitioned from a legacy organization with a top-down approach to an evolutionary organization that encourages innovation and collaboration. Another example is Adobe, which successfully transitioned from selling packaged software to providing cloud-based services. These transitions often involve a shift in company culture and operating systems, emphasizing collective intelligence and self-regulation over strict compliance.

View all questions

Ask follow up

While the activities of an organization might be complicated, the organization itself is complex. Faced with this complexity, the legacy organization sees performance as a function of compliance: get everyone to do what we say, and we will surely achieve our goals. The evolutionary organization recognizes that performance is the result of collective intelligence and self-regulation: if we create the right conditions, everyone will continually find ways to achieve the goals.

Ask follow up

The next section describes the principles and practices of the evolutionary organization.

The evolutionary organization

An organization's Operating System is made up of 12 domains. We need to question and reinvent our approach in each domain to become a people positive and complexity conscious organization.

1. Purpose

Any organization or team needs a purpose. A mission statement that defines success as making a profit lacks an inspiring purpose. Wholefoods' "Nourish people and the planet" is much more socially positive.

The organization's purpose has to show up at every level, and any metrics should be guidelines for steering toward that purpose. Every team or unit should have a strong sense of their collective purpose.

2. Authority

Legacy organizations assume you have to be given permission to do something; evolutionary organizations ensure everyone has the autonomy to do anything that serves the organization's purpose unless it is specifically prohibited. People should have the freedom to fail so that teams and individuals can learn and grow.

Ask follow up

Centralized authority is too slow to respond in a rapidly changing world. Push authority to the edge of the organization, to where the information is.

3. Structure

Evolutionary organizations should be dynamic networks where members have the freedom to organize around projects and programs. Create self-sufficient units or cells of 10-150 people. Create simple rules for how teams are formed or changed, then let people go where their skills and energy take them.

Ensure that the organization is driven by the teams that touch the market, not the ones at the center.

4. Strategy

Exercise discretion when using metrics such as Objectives and Key Results as a form of top-down control, where people focus on hitting the OKRs and not on figuring out what is best for the organization. Use scenario planning to think about what might happen, not what must happen.

Every 90 days or so, gather the team to generate a few strategy statements and figure out what to prioritize. In areas of rapid change, your strategy is only as good as your ability to learn and adjust course.

5. Resources

People can direct their own time and attention to where they add the most value. The 100-year-old Swedish bank Svenska Handelsbanken deploys its various resources—capital, energy, space, etc.—around the notion that "The branch is the bank." Each of the 800+ branches is free to make their own decisions about resource allocation, include lending decisions, marketing, services, and so on.

Questions and answers

Can you analyze the implications of shifting from fixed targets to relative ones as suggested in Brave New Work?

View answer

Shifting from fixed targets to relative ones can have several implications. Firstly, it allows for more flexibility as it enables adjustments based on changing conditions. This can lead to more accurate and realistic goal-setting. Secondly, it encourages a more competitive environment as teams are compared to each other. This can drive performance and innovation. Lastly, it can reduce the risk of long-term commitments that may not yield the expected results. However, it's important to note that this approach may not be suitable for all types of businesses or teams, and it requires a robust system for tracking and comparing performance.

How can the concepts from Brave New Work be implemented in real-world scenarios to improve decision-making processes?

View answer

The concepts from Brave New Work can be implemented in real-world scenarios to improve decision-making processes by shifting away from traditional budgeting processes and fixed targets. Instead, resources should be allocated based on real-time information and conditions. This allows for more flexibility and responsiveness in decision-making. Additionally, long-term spending commitments should be minimized in favor of discretionary funds, allowing for more adaptability to unforeseen changes or opportunities.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Get away from the traditional budgeting process, which is unresponsive to changing conditions. Ditch fixed targets in favor of relative ones, company to company, and team to team. You cannot predict the future so, where appropriate, minimize long-term spending commitments in favor of discretionary funds. Allocate resources based on real-time information, not annual budget cycles.

Ask follow up

[text] Innovation usually happens when things are used in ways we didn't intend. Play-Doh was supposed to be a cleaning product for wallpaper until kids started "misusing" it. Instead of having R&D spending as a separate line item in the accounts, let innovation happen across the organization. People are inherently creative, so trust them to sense and pursue opportunities.

Ask follow up

Avoid standards that say "You have to use this tool, this way" in favor of defaults that say, "If you don't know how, then try this, but if you see a better way, do that!"

7. Workflow

Spotify's approach to workflow ensures that teams are "loosely coupled but tightly aligned," maximizing strategic alignment while minimizing dependencies and red tape between teams. Its workflow looks like a regatta of speedboats heading in the same general direction rather than one massive ocean liner trying to wend its way through a series of functions.

Ask follow up

Treat everything as a project, starting, stopping, or evolving activities with intention. Consider running every project as a series of one- or two-week sprints. Let local methods and tools flourish. Ensure every team has the capacity to do the work and to improve how they do it.

8. Meetings

The average employee attends 62 meetings a month and thinks that more than half of them are a waste of time. For U.S. businesses, that adds up to $37 billion in salary costs spent on unnecessary meetings. But shared consciousness and vibrant networks mean we do have to meet sometimes.

Avoid status updates. They become time-wasting theatrical productions that don't move anything forward. Instead, encourage every team to have a monthly governance meeting where everyone can voice concerns and propose changes. Hold periodic retrospective meetings for people to share perspectives on what happened and what they learned. Try canceling all meetings for two weeks, so that you can discover which ones you really need.

Ask follow up

9. Information

In legacy organizations, information is power, hoarded to elevate one's status, and shared on a need-to-know basis. Evolutionary organizations value and practice transparency, making all information available to all participants, because no one knows what information will prove to be critical. Instead of pushing information out to all members, which quickly becomes overwhelming, let them find the information when they need it, in a way that is accessible and searchable by everyone, any time. Work in public and share work in development together, instead of only selectively releasing "perfect" information.

Questions and answers

What are some strategies a startup can use to reduce email overload and enhance productivity?

View answer

Startups can employ several strategies to reduce email overload and enhance productivity. One effective method is to ban internal emails and instead use a messaging app like Slack. Slack organizes conversations into channels by topic, making communication more efficient. Additionally, implementing a clear email policy can help. This could include guidelines on when to use email, what to include in the subject line, and how to keep emails concise. Regularly scheduled 'no email' times can also reduce overload and increase focus on other tasks.

How can a traditional business sector like retail implement messaging apps like Slack to improve their internal communication?

View answer

Traditional business sectors like retail can implement messaging apps like Slack to improve their internal communication by first, introducing the platform to the team and providing training on how to use it. They can then organize conversations into channels by topic, making it easier for employees to find and participate in relevant discussions. This can replace the need for excessive emails and meetings, speeding up decision-making processes. It's also important to establish guidelines for using the app to ensure it's used effectively and doesn't become another source of distraction.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Email is a context-free information sinkhole. The average employee checks their email 36 times an hour and receives 304 emails a week. Try banning internal email in favor of a messaging app like Slack, the fastest-growing workplace software in history, with tools that organize conversations into channels by topic.

Ask follow up

10. Membership

In a complex system, the interactions matter more than the parts. Everyone needs to feel a sense of belonging within their teams and the wider organization, but don't build walls between teams and consequently create silos. The boundaries need to be porous enough for teams to renew themselves continually.

Questions and answers

How can the operating system of a company hinder its performance and decision-making process?

View answer

The operating system of a company can hinder its performance and decision-making process in several ways. If the system is not designed to facilitate efficient communication and collaboration, it can lead to silos, where information is not shared effectively across the organization. This can slow down decision-making and hinder performance. Additionally, if the system does not support agility and adaptability, it can make it difficult for the company to respond quickly to changes in the business environment. Finally, if the system does not promote diversity and inclusion, it can lead to homogeneity, which can stifle innovation and limit the range of perspectives and ideas within the company.

Why is it important for legacy organizations to evolve and become autonomous?

View answer

Legacy organizations need to evolve and become autonomous to stay competitive in the rapidly changing business environment. By evolving, they can adapt to new technologies, market trends, and customer expectations, which are crucial for their survival and growth. Becoming autonomous allows them to make quicker decisions, be more flexible, and respond faster to changes. This can lead to improved efficiency, productivity, and innovation. Moreover, it can help them attract and retain diverse talent, which has been shown to enhance performance.

View all questions

Ask follow up

Hiring for culture fit makes sense early in a firm's history, but later on, it can lead to overwhelming homogeneity and actually cause firms to underperform. Organizations should get more interesting and diverse over time. A recent McKinsey study found that companies in the top quartile for gender and ethnic diversity were, respectively, 15% and 35% more likely to outperform those in the bottom quartile.

Ask follow up

11. Mastery

Taylorism views work as a place to perform, whereas the evolutionary organization sees it as a place to learn. Welcome the conditions for continuous growth, with members of different levels of knowledge and skills working together and learning from each other.

The average manager spends up to 210 hours preparing for and doing annual appraisals, a process that makes employees spectators in their development. Instead, let them solicit and guide their feedback, with periodic updates and input from team members.

12. Compensation

Higher pay can decrease job dissatisfaction, but it won't meaningfully increase or sustain job satisfaction. Compensation should be fair and generous enough to not matter and to support motivation, keep the focus on autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Use profit sharing to connect everyone to the organization's success. Eliminate bonuses and instead pay above market for the best talents you can find.

Ask follow up

How to change

How do you unleash change in a culture that is addicted to planning and control? How can you turn tension and frustration into experiments that move the team forward? A recent McKinsey study found that only 26% of transformation efforts succeed in the eyes of the people involved, with that number dropping to 6% among frontline employees.

Ask follow up

The first step is to recognize that culture cannot be designed, it has to emerge. You cannot change hearts and minds with a haiku. Instead, we have to focus on changing the system and on recognizing that change is not a finite journey.

Happy accidents

Change plans can become a dogma wielded from the top with little room for adapting as we go: you can't blow up bureaucracy with a bureaucratic change process. Human innovation is often the result of happy accidents. So in place of set plans and goals, be willing to try new things, to notice and amplify positive patterns and minimize what isn't working. Six patterns help to set the conditions for change.

Questions and answers

What are the potential benefits of creating a team of wayfinders in an organization and how can it contribute to moving beyond bureaucracy?

View answer

Creating a team of wayfinders in an organization can have several potential benefits. Firstly, it can help in moving beyond bureaucracy by decentralizing decision-making and promoting self-management. Wayfinders are willing to try new things and can identify tensions or gaps in the current system, propose new practices, and conduct experiments to improve the system. This can lead to faster decision-making, reduced meeting overload, and breaking down of silos. Secondly, wayfinders can help create a learning space where team members can open their hearts and minds, leading to innovative ideas and solutions. Lastly, by gradually extending the boundary of this team, the entire organization can slowly transition towards a more efficient and effective operating system.

How can the concept of looping help in decentralizing change and initiating self-management in a traditional business sector?

View answer

The concept of 'looping' can help in decentralizing change and initiating self-management in a traditional business sector by creating a continuous three-stage process. The stages are: identifying tensions, proposing practices, and conducting experiments. When people recognize that a system or process is not functioning well, they have identified a tension, a gap between the current state and the potential state. Proposing practices involves suggesting new ways to address these tensions. Conducting experiments allows these new practices to be tested and refined. This process encourages continuous improvement and adaptation, fostering a culture of self-management.

View all questions

Ask follow up

1. Commitment: Those with power or influence must be committed to moving beyond bureaucracy. Next, create a team of "wayfinders", a group willing to be the first to try new things.
2. Boundaries: Create a space where things will be done differently—a team, a meeting, a room. Then, gradually extend the boundary to include more teams or areas.
3. Priming: Prime your team of catalysts by pulling them out of their patterns and into a learning space, where a few hours of games and exercises can open their hearts and minds and unleash epiphanies.
4. Looping: Looping is the continual three-stage process where change is decentralized and self-management begins. The three stages are: identify tensions, propose practices, and conduct experiments. When people acknowledge that some system or process is not working well, they have identified a tension, a gap between how things are and how they could be. Tensions include things like decision-making bottlenecks, too many meetings, not taking risks, too many silos, unclear priorities, and so on. Once a team names its tensions, it can explore practices that might change things and then set up experiments to see what works. Start with smaller, shorter experiments that can be run over a week, eventually getting to ones that require some onboarding time and a few weeks to see them through.
5. Criticality: Criticality is the tipping point where enough people are committed to the ideals of self-management that it is impractical to go back to the way things were. You'll know you're at this point when people start to adopt a new language for ways of working and culture, and when the practices being introduced are traveling beyond the boundary that you set.
6. Continuity: When continuous participatory change is a way of life.

Continuous participatory change

A successful evolutionary organization has to make it safe for people to fail. Psychological safety must play a major role in the Operating System transformation.

The most significant barrier to change is the leader—leadership has to recognize the importance of creating the space for change and then stepping out of the way. Don't try to control the change.

Once teams have created a space for change, including making sure everyone agrees and has the time to try, you also have to hold onto that space. Let the teams figure things out for themselves and make sure everyone can speak up if they see something unsafe to try. People will change when it makes sense to them—so if you meet resistance, find out what people are trying to tell you. Learn by doing, you can't improve your swing by reading Golf Digest, you have to get out on the course and practice.

Ask follow up