What organizational policies and principles bring out the best in your staff? What kind of work environment leads to the best creative output?
In Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration, Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull shares insights from decades as head of one of the most creative companies of all time.
Catmull brings us behind the scenes of Pixar, as it grew from a fledgling animation shop to a force to reckon with Disney itself. Most importantly, he shares the steps he took to keep the brilliant and creative minds that worked for him healthy, happy and productive.
Ask follow up
Learn how Pixar maintains the health and vigor of its creative culture so that you can do the same for your company. Pixar grew from a scrappy start-up to a place that intentionally spends millions on creative experiments. Catmull's values of collaboration, healthy risk, feedback and iteration shine through the mechanisms he's created at Pixar that helped the studio thrive. Whether it's the "Braintrust –" Pixar's group of masterminds – or a "Postmortem" for every successful film, Catmull has embedded excellence in Pixar's DNA. Finally, get inside Pixar's most brilliant directors' minds to understand how they think about leadership in the murky waters of creativity.
Ask follow up
Catmull is a brilliant computer scientist and animator. Paired with storytelling genius John Lasseter and other talented minds, they forged new territory in film by creating the first computer-animated movie, "Toy Story." Since his youth, making a computer-animated movie had been Catmull's dream. So, after he achieved this feat and Pixar stood on firm ground, he was surprised by feelings of unrest."I'd spent two decades building a train and laying its track. Now, the thought of merely driving it struck me as a far less interesting task."
Ask follow up
Catmull had been heavily influenced by his time at the University of Utah, surrounded by inspirational professors and inventive classmates. They challenged one another to new heights of computer science and maintained a culture of collaboration and camaraderie. An entire year went by after "Toy Story" before he realized what his next professional aspiration would be. He was motivated by the challenge of creating a like-minded culture at his growing company, Pixar. How could Pixar continue to produce grade-A content while balancing the increasing demand for more movies? How could Catmull, as their leader, support an over-stretched staff while also maintaining efficiency, productivity and creativity?
Ask follow up
This new challenge of forming and sustaining a creative culture became Catmull's driving force. He began to look beyond the thrill of storytelling and computer animation and towards Pixar's long-term health and sustainability as a motion picture giant. In embracing this role, he captured several replicable principles for anyone looking to improve their corporate culture. These principles are especially applicable to those working in creative environments.
Ask follow up
Keys to the culture
"I believe that managers must loosen the controls, not tighten them. They must accept risk; they must trust the people they work with and strive to clear the path for them; and always, they must pay attention to and engage with anything that creates fear," Catmull writes.
Listen to everyone
To assess the progress, you must take stock of culture from all angles and levels. At Pixar, a simple conference room table was perpetuating issues and blocking creativity. A designer favored by Steve Jobs had picked out this aesthetically beautiful table. It was long, large and rectangular, taking up the bulk of an often-used meeting room. For thirteen years, this table was used for meetings to discuss creative content. It was so large it could seat thirty people in total, most of whom "faced off" against one another in two long lines. So, what was the issue?
Ask follow up
The table's geometry was perpetuating notions of hierarchy, limiting new voices, and blocking creativity. At one point, place cards for the senior executives were created to ensure that they sat together near the middle to hear as many people as possible. However, the message this sent was not doing any favors for the collaborative, flat culture that Catmull hoped to create.
Ask follow up
For thirteen years, this table appeared fine from the perspective of Catmull and the other senior leaders at Pixar. It was only after they spoke to more people and reflected on their issues that they realized something as simple as a table set-up was hindering creative minds.
Tap into the "braintrust"
Pixar consistently produces top-notch content from a variety of directors. But the ascent to that place of strength has not been easy. Along the way, Pixar has had films that have been relative failures. They fired directors mid-production. They spent millions to develop a movie and later shut it down. But through it all, they found a way to continually create award-winning and wildly popular films. The "Braintrust" has been a crucial key to their success.
Ask follow up
The "Braintrust" was a group of Pixar's "proven problem-solvers who worked magnificently together to dissect scenes that were falling flat." This group wasn't something that Catmull designed or chose. Instead, it had assembled organically because of how they gelled, applying their complementary talents and personalities to improve films that were in development.
Ask follow up
Pixar had tapped several junior directors to lead "Toy Story 2." Unfortunately, a crisis arose midstream when John Lasseter did an in-depth review of the draft film and realized it had crippling problems. To fix these issues, the "Braintrust'' was born. Its members were superbly talented, highly committed senior leaders at Pixar. How did they work together and what made their work distinctive? This diagram explains how the "Braintrust" was structured.
Ask follow up
Initially, there were only five members of the "Braintrust:" John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton, Pete Docter, Lee Unkrich and Joe Ranft. These men were some of Pixar's best and brightest, with expertise in storytelling, editing, directing, animation and screenwriting. Individually, each had a knack for solving fundamental problems for films in development. Together, they were an unstoppable force that ensured each Pixar film was of the highest quality possible. Directors with films in development would schedule meetings of the "Braintrust" every one to two months throughout the development process. The intent of the meetings was to provide a space for candor in solving a film's fundamental inadequacies. What was working? What was falling flat? Which characters, lines or animations could be improved?
Ask follow up
The "Braintrust" would meet with directors in person, where "Braintrust" members provided verbal feedback, and directors and their team would take copious notes. However, it was not the "Braintrust's" role to fix the issues but merely provide feedback. They diagnose but don't treat. Catmull and his senior team felt strongly that this boundary improves a director's own problem-solving skills. More importantly, they also trusted the talent of their staff, conceding that the director was the person most likely to come up with the best solution to the issue.
Ask follow up
Iterate often, and always be learning
The practice of making quick iterations of one's work is a driving principle that appears throughout the book. Creative workers can feel a great deal of pressure and falsely expect themselves to land either in "writer's block" or "flow" territory. On the contrary, creative work resembles many other types of productivity and progress. The first version will be messy and imperfect. Prototypes and pilots are necessary because they get you to begin and not wallow in indecision. The first attempt will always teach you something, and a mindset of continual growth and learning is of the utmost value. The sooner the first draft is completed, the sooner others can give feedback to make it better, and the more you will learn about yourself and your work. The more cycles of this occur, the better the end result will be. The importance of iteration, continual growth and feedback are not novel. However, Catmull set up several mechanisms at Pixar to engrain these principles into the culture. These were all in addition to perhaps the most fruitful feedback mechanism, the "Braintrust."
Ask follow up
In addition to the "Braintrust" meetings, the three practices most central to iteration and learning at Pixar were "Dailies"," "short experiments" and "Postmortems." "Dailies" happened during a film's development, whereas short experiments happened before a film was developed and post mortems happened after a film was released. All three practices contributed to a culture of learning.
Ask follow up
Dailies were the forum through which inexperienced animators and junior directors received daily and meticulous feedback from senior directors and other Pixar leaders. Animators would prepare drafts or sketches of scenes in progress and present them to the film's director and others on the team. Through this practice, everyone at Pixar learned that it was okay and expected to share incomplete work. It ensured progress was happening and gave animators creative ownership yet ensured that they received timely feedback. "Dailies" helped to break down the stigma of showing one's incomplete work.
Ask follow up
Short experiments refer mainly to Pixar's famous short films, usually two to six minutes in length. These films are often played before feature films in theaters and are usually endearing. In this way, Pixar fans have come to know, expect and appreciate these short films. On the face of it, the "Shorts" are hardly justified, costing up to two million dollars per film to make and garnering zero revenue. But Pixar found a way to make these worth their while. Initially, they hoped that "Shorts" would help develop junior, inexperienced directors and maintain a culture of quirky creativity. They already knew that viewers liked them, so that was a benefit. However, they found that the "Shorts"' true value lay in their ability to serve as "short experiments." Remember, Pixar is a pioneer in computer-animated film. As the leader, they were both producing hit movies while also trying to advance the technology of animation at the same time.
Ask follow up
Shorts became the vehicle to test new technologies and animation methods. The use of unproven technology in a short was significantly less risky than designing a whole feature film using a methodology that might prove ineffective. As founding "Braintrust" member Joe Ranft put it, "Better to have train wrecks with miniature trains than with real ones."
Ask follow up
Also, "Shorts" allowed junior staffers to build a broader skill set than they would have in working on a longer film. "Shorts" were like start-ups in that a smaller team meant broader responsibilities for each team member. "Shorts" became a training ground for Pixar's winning technology and talent.
Lastly, "Postmortems" were crucial in taking stock of how Pixar's film production process was working. After a film was released, the temptation was to sit back and relish its success, looking forward to the next one. But Catmull insisted that the team meet, discuss, analyze, reflect and unearth any issues that came up during the film's development, while the experience was still fresh. He knew that Pixar employees disliked this practice, but he insisted upon it because of its value for learning. "Postmortems" codified learnings for the future and, in many cases, smoothed over personal tensions that had occurred throughout the process.
Ask follow up
In discussions with senior directors at Pixar, Catmull has learned that most leaders of creative processes use "mental models" for managing their teams. The models have one thing in common – they imagine the role of a director as someone needing to relax more than they think, and often leading others through uncharted territory.
Ask follow up
Brad Bird, director of "The Incredibles," thinks of directing like downhill snow skiing. When first learning to ski, if you overthink, you'll crash (as he did). It will be scary sometimes, but if you just relax and try to enjoy it, you'll find the most success. He directs and leads this way too.
Byron Howard, who directed "Tangled," likens directing to playing guitar. You'll know you're getting good when you get so comfortable that you don't have to think.
"Monsters, Inc." director Peter Docter thinks that leading others in creativity is like running through a long dark tunnel. As the director, you must keep the faith that you will come out on the other side. It will be long, and you don't know exactly where you're going, but your team is following you through the tunnel. You have to keep going, and eventually, you'll see the light, he says.
Ask follow up
Rich Moore from "Wreck-It Ralph" says that making a movie is like going through a maze. The worst thing you can do is panic and run around in circles. Moore advises against running "willy-nilly" but instead says to slow down. Remember where you've been and where you're going. Just keep moving, and you'll begin to recognize the turns and paths to take.
Ask follow up